Gobernanza institucional de la inteligencia artificial generativa y comportamiento ético en educación superior: efectos mediadores de la alfabetización en IA y la legitimidad percibida de las políticas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65415/g4d29j67Palabras clave:
: gobernanza de la IA; inteligencia artificial generativa; alfabetización en IA; legitimidad institucional; integridad académica.Resumen
La adopción acelerada de inteligencia artificial generativa (IAG) ha convertido la gobernanza institucional en un problema de conducta, no solo de regulación. Este artículo analiza cómo las políticas universitarias pueden promover comportamientos éticos y propone un modelo de mediación paralela mediante alfabetización en IA y legitimidad percibida. Se realizó una revisión integrativa crítica de literatura y documentos normativos publicados hasta el 27 de agosto de 2026. El corpus reunió 35 fuentes centrales de 2022-2026 —28 trabajos académicos y siete marcos institucionales— y dos antecedentes fundacionales. La síntesis temática muestra que las políticas claras pero aisladas producen cumplimiento frágil cuando no se acompañan de formación, participación, criterios disciplinares y mecanismos de revisión. La alfabetización en IA media la relación al transformar normas abstractas en capacidades técnicas, críticas y éticas; la legitimidad percibida la media al convertir la autoridad formal en aceptación normativa basada en justicia, pertinencia y confianza. Se formula un modelo con seis proposiciones contrastables y un esquema de operacionalización para estudiantes y docentes. Se concluye que la gobernanza ética eficaz debe ser formativa, participativa, proporcional y adaptativa. El aporte consiste en desplazar el análisis desde la existencia documental de políticas hacia los mecanismos que explican su traducción en transparencia, verificación, autoría responsable y protección de datos.
Descargas
Referencias
An, Y., Yu, J. H., & James, S. (2025). Investigating the higher education institutions’ guidelines and policies regarding the use of generative AI in teaching, learning, research, and administration. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22, Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00507-3
Bittle, K., & El-Gayar, O. (2025). Generative AI and academic integrity in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Information, 16(4), Article 296. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040296
Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Crompton, H., Burke, D., Nickel, C., Bozkurt, A., Miao, F., Sharples, M., Greene, J. A., Parsons, D., Gill-Simmen, L., Edmett, A., Pegrum, M., de Waard, I., Bonk, C. J., Garcia, M. B., Curry, J. H., Lindsey, L., Yang, M., Marshall, S., Bali, M., … Yu, S. (2026). Governing generative AI in higher education: A global Delphi study on policy and practice. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 23, Article 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-026-00602-z
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Eaton, S. E. (2023). Postplagiarism: Transdisciplinary ethics and integrity in the age of artificial intelligence and neurotechnology. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19, Article 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00144-1
European Commission. (2022). Ethical guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and data in teaching and learning for educators. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/153756
European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence. Official Journal of the European Union, L 2024/1689. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj
Furze, L., Perkins, M., Roe, J., & MacVaugh, J. (2024). The AI Assessment Scale (AIAS) in action: A pilot implementation of GenAI-supported assessment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.9434
Gonsalves, C. (2025). Addressing student non-compliance in AI use declarations: Implications for academic integrity and assessment in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 50(4), 592–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2415654
Główczewski, M., & Burdziej, S. (2023). (In)justice in academia: Procedural fairness, students’ academic identification, and perceived legitimacy of university authorities. Higher Education, 86, 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00907-8
Gümüş, M. M., & Kara, M. (2025). Development and validation of the Generative AI Literacy for Learning Scale (GenAI-LLs). Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 41(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.10236
Jiang, Y., Xie, L., & Cao, X. (2025). Exploring the effectiveness of institutional policies and regulations for generative AI usage in higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 79(4), Article e70054. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70054
Jin, Y., Yan, L., Echeverria, V., Gašević, D., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2025). Generative AI in higher education: A global perspective of institutional adoption policies and guidelines. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, Article 100348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100348
Johnston, H., Wells, R. F., Shanks, E. M., Boey, T., & Parsons, B. N. (2024). Student perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence technologies in higher education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00149-4
Kong, S.-C., Cheung, W. M.-Y., & Zhang, G. (2023). Evaluating an artificial intelligence literacy programme for developing university students’ conceptual understanding, literacy, empowerment and ethical awareness. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 16–30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48707964
Laupichler, M. C., Aster, A., Schirch, J., & Raupach, T. (2022). Artificial intelligence literacy in higher and adult education: A scoping literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, Article 100101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100101
Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–16). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
Luo, J. (2024). A critical review of GenAI policies in higher education assessment: A call to reconsider the ‘originality’ of students’ work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(5), 651–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2309963
McDonald, N., Johri, A., Ali, A., & Hingle, A. H. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in higher education: Evidence from an analysis of institutional policies and guidelines. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 3, Article 100121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100121
Miao, F., & Cukurova, M. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/ZJTE2084
Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/EWZM9535
Miao, F., Shiohira, K., & Lao, N. (2024). AI competency framework for students. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000391105
Moorhouse, B. L., Yeo, M. A., & Wan, Y. (2023). Generative AI tools and assessment: Guidelines of the world’s top-ranking universities. Computers and Education Open, 5, Article 100151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100151
Ng, D. T. K., Wu, W., Leung, J. K. L., Chiu, T. K. F., & Chu, S. K. W. (2024). Design and validation of the AI literacy questionnaire: The affective, behavioural, cognitive and ethical approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(3), 1082–1104. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13411
Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B. P. T. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 4221–4241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w
OECD. (2023). Opportunities, guidelines and guardrails for effective and equitable use of AI in education. In OECD digital education outlook 2023. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/2b39e98b-en
Perkins, M., Furze, L., Roe, J., & MacVaugh, J. (2024). The Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale (AIAS): A framework for ethical integration of generative AI in educational assessment. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 21(6). https://doi.org/10.53761/q3azde36
Reed, J. M., Ferdig, R. E., Dodson, T. M., Gunstad, J., & Hughes, J. W. (2026). AI literacy and scenario-based ethical judgment about generative AI among undergraduate students. Journal of Academic Ethics, 24, Article 82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-026-09757-w
Reisig, M. D., & Bain, S. N. (2016). University legitimacy and student compliance with academic dishonesty codes: A partial test of the process-based model of self-regulation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815611165
Southworth, J., Migliaccio, K., Glover, J., Glover, J. N., Reed, D., McCarty, C., Brendemuhl, J., & Thomas, A. (2023). Developing a model for AI across the curriculum: Transforming the higher education landscape via innovation in AI literacy. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 100127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100127
Sullivan, M., Kelly, A., & McLaughlan, P. (2023). ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.17
Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency. (2024). Gen AI strategies for Australian higher education: Emerging practice. https://www.teqsa.gov.au/guides-resources/resources/corporate-publications/gen-ai-strategies-australian-higher-education-emerging-practice
Walter, Y. (2024). Embracing the future of artificial intelligence in the classroom: The relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3
Ying, J. (2026). Academic integrity in the age of generative AI: A scoping review of research on higher education student voices. Journal of Academic Ethics, 24, Article 78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-026-09752-1
Yusuf, A., Pervin, N., & Román-González, M. (2024). Generative AI and the future of higher education: A threat to academic integrity or reformation? Evidence from multicultural perspectives. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, Article 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00453-6
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 RODRIGO JOSE PAZMIÑO PEREZ, CARLA LOZANO ALVARADO, BETSY SOLIS GOMEZ, CRISTHIAN LEON PEREZ
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
