Playful English Teaching and Beneficiary Satisfaction in a University Community Outreach Project in Milagro

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65415/ctdqxm42

Palabras clave:

English language teaching; playful learning; community outreach; beneficiary satisfaction; pre-service teacher education.

Resumen

Community outreach can provide settings in which prospective teachers connect university coursework with the practical demands of teaching English. This study describes the implementation and beneficiary satisfaction of a university outreach project conducted in a parish community in Milagro, Ecuador, during 2025–2026. A retrospective descriptive design combined documentary analysis of programme records with a secondary analysis of aggregate satisfaction data. The documentary corpus included the approved project and execution contract, two individual activity logs, one individual final report, consolidated university participation records, and a subsequently developed methodological guide. The administrative records contained 38 university students across two cohorts, of whom 36 completed 96 practicum hours each. The selected documents described visual materials, songs, movement, games, guided oral exchanges and short written activities. In the satisfaction summary, each of five criteria contained 125 valid responses. Excellent ratings ranged from 82.4% for attendance to 88.0% for satisfaction of beneficiaries’ needs; no Inadequate ratings were recorded. Across the five criteria, 535 of 625 item ratings were Excellent (85.6%). These results document programme delivery and a favourable appraisal of the service, rather than measured gains in English proficiency. The study identifies practical connections between playful teaching, supervised community practice and the organisation of reusable materials, while showing why satisfaction, practicum completion and language learning require separate indicators.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733109

Carless, D. (2002). Implementing task-based learning with young learners. ELT Journal, 56(4), 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.4.389

Celio, C. I., Durlak, J., & Dymnicki, A. (2011). A meta-analysis of the impact of service-learning on students. Journal of Experiential Education, 34(2), 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382591103400205

Chambers, D. J., & Lavery, S. (2012). Service-learning: A valuable component of pre-service teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(4), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2012v37n4.2

Davis, G. M. (2017). Songs in the young learner classroom: A critical review of evidence. ELT Journal, 71(4), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw097

Pinter, A. (2017). Teaching young language learners (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://www.oupjapan.co.jp/en/products/detail/17550

Skene, K., O’Farrelly, C. M., Byrne, E. M., Kirby, N., Stevens, E. C., & Ramchandani, P. G. (2022). Can guidance during play enhance children’s learning and development in educational contexts? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Child Development, 93(4), 1162–1180. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13730

Tomlinson, B. (Ed.). (2023). Developing materials for language teaching (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic. https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/developing-materials-for-language-teaching-9781350199675/

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x

Descargas

Publicado

2026-10-28

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a