The Implementation of CLIL to Enhance Oral Communication Skills in Undergraduate Students

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65415/rcs.v2i1.13

Palabras clave:

CLIL; Oral communication; English language teaching; Higher education; Speaking proficiency

Resumen

This study investigates the effectiveness of the Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) approach in enhancing oral communication skills among undergraduate students of English as a Foreign Language. The research was conducted over twelve weeks with thirty participants aged 18 to 22 enrolled in an intermediate English course. A quasi-experimental design with pre-test and post-test assessments was applied to measure students’ progress in four key areas: vocabulary use, fluency, time management, and confidence. The CLIL intervention included thematic debates, project-based presentations, and authentic communicative tasks integrating academic content and linguistic objectives. Statistical results revealed significant improvement across all dimensions, with participants progressing from level A1.2 to A2.2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). The Chi-square test (p = 0.001) confirmed the strong relationship between the implementation of CLIL and the enhancement of speaking proficiency. Findings highlight the pedagogical potential of CLIL to increase learner motivation, promote meaningful interaction, and reduce communicative anxiety in EFL classrooms. This research contributes to the understanding of effective methodologies for language teaching in Latin American higher education and encourages further exploration of CLIL’s adaptability to diverse learning contexts.

Citas

Aladini, R., & Jalambo, R. (2021). The impact of CLIL on students’ speaking skills. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(3), 204–214. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1203.03

BERA. (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.). British Educational Research Association. https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018

British Council. (2023). English proficiency in Latin America 2023 report. British Council. https://www.britishcouncil.org

Burbano, J., & López, P. (2023). Educational inequalities in Ecuadorian universities. SENESCYT.

Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D. (2014). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt011

Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment – Companion volume. Council of Europe Publishing. https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages

Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press.

Coyle, D., & Meyer, O. (2021). Beyond CLIL: Pluriliteracies teaching for deeper learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914012

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000092

Delliou, A., & Zafiri, M. (2016). CLIL and foreign language learning outcomes: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 45–59.

Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.

Education First. (2023). EF English proficiency index 2023. https://www.ef.com/epi

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.

Field, A. (2020). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Guamán-Gutama, R. (2018). Estrategias de motivación y aprendizaje del inglés en contextos universitarios ecuatorianos. Revista Educación y Lenguaje, 6(2), 59–72.

Mays, N. (2019). Reliability in quantitative educational research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(3), 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1517237

Mehisto, P. (2021). CLIL essentials: Contextualized language learning in higher education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72978-8

Mertens, D. M. (2020). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Mora, C. (2021). La vulnerabilidad económica en el sistema educativo ecuatoriano. FLACSO.

Novitasari, D., Rahmawati, I., & Widiastuti, R. (2021). Improving students’ speaking skills through the CLIL approach. Indonesian Journal of English Education, 8(2), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v8i2.23420

Pinoargote-Cedeño, M. (2019). Desarrollo de la competencia oral en estudiantes universitarios ecuatorianos. Revista Lengua y Sociedad, 14(1), 70–83.

Rahmawati, F., & Ertin, S. (2014). Developing students’ confidence through CLIL methodology. Journal of English Teaching, 4(2), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v4i2.123

Torres, C., & Villafuerte, J. (2020). Impact of CLIL methodology on the development of English communicative competence in Ecuadorian higher education. Teaching English with Technology, 20(2), 72–90.

Ullauri-Moreno, R. (2017). Desafíos del aprendizaje del inglés en Ecuador. Revista Educación, 41(2), 55–66.

Descargas

Publicado

2024-03-15

Cómo citar

Vélez Sánchez, M. E. (2024). The Implementation of CLIL to Enhance Oral Communication Skills in Undergraduate Students.  Research Club Scientia, 2(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.65415/rcs.v2i1.13